Redefining Insurance Supervision in the Digital Era: A Conceptual Framework for Smart Supervisory Transformation

Khadivar, Ameneh; Niakan, Leili; Bafekr Sharak, Naser

doi:10.22034/jista.2026.578486.1085

Redefining Insurance Supervision in the Digital Era: A Conceptual Framework for Smart Supervisory Transformation

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ameneh Khadivar ¹

Leili Niakan ²

Naser Bafekr Sharak ³

¹ Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

² Assistance Professor, General Insurance Group, Insurance Research Center, Tehran, Iran

³ PhD in Applied Mathematics, Insurance Industry Researcher, Dana Insurance Company, Tehran

10.22034/jista.2026.578486.1085

Abstract

Technological advancements and the increasing complexity of risks in the insurance industry have challenged the effectiveness of traditional supervisory models. This study aims to conceptualize “smart supervision,” distinguish it from related concepts, and identify the key components required for its implementation. It proposes an analytical framework to facilitate the transition of insurance supervisory authorities toward a smart supervisory approach. This research is applied in purpose and descriptive–analytical in nature. The sources include scholarly literature indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, as well as official documents issued by international insurance supervisory authorities, which were collected through a systematic and purposive review. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and a comparative analytical framework. The findings indicate that smart supervision goes beyond the mere digitalization of supervisory tools and requires a paradigm shift from reactive, ex post oversight to data-driven, risk-based, and forward-looking supervision. Five key dimensions were identified: data governance, data-driven decision-making, technological integration, risk-based supervision, and digital reporting. The study demonstrates that implementing smart supervision in the insurance sector necessitates a gradual, data-reliable approach, reforms in institutional and legal frameworks, and enhanced collaboration between supervisory authorities and insurance undertakings. The proposed framework can serve as a foundation for developing a supervisory transformation roadmap, enhancing market transparency, and strengthening policyholder protection.

Keywords

Data Governance

RegTech

Risk-Based Supervision

Smart Regulation

Smart Supervision

Abed, M., & Ghanbarvand, H. (2023). Sandbox: A novel tool for smart supervision and regulation in the insurance industry [Conference paper]. 30th National and 11th International Conference on Insurance and Development: Evolution of the Insurance Industry Ecosystem (Takaful, Governance, and Emerging Technologies), Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/2115371 (in Persian)

Alaika Advisory. (2025). Insurance trends 2025. https://www.alaika-advisory.com/insights/insurance-trends-2025

Amini, A. (2021). Presenting a paradigmatic model of smart electronic supervision in the insurance industry: Social constructivism [Conference paper]. 28th Insurance and Development Conference, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/1390786 (in Persian)

Arasto, I., & Hosseini, E. (2024). An optimal model for smart supervision in Iran's insurance industry [Conference paper]. 31st National and 12th International Conference on Insurance and Development: Public Satisfaction and Trust in the Insurance Industry. Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/2148742/ (in Persian)

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech, regTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37(3), 373–415. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3088303

Baumol, W. J. (1986). Williamson’s The economic institutions of capitalism [Review of the book The economic institutions of capitalism, by O. E. Williamson]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 17(2), 279–283. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2555390

Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Braun, A., & Schreiber, F. (2017). The Current InsurTech Landscape: Business Models and Disruptive Potential. I.VW-HSG Schriftenreihe, 62. University of St. Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG). https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/usgivw/62.html

Charoenwong, B., Kowaleski, Z. T., Kwan, A., & Sutherland, A. G. (2024). RegTech: Technology-driven compliance and its effects on profitability, operations, and market structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 154, 103792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103792

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework. https://www.coso.org/guidance-on-ic

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2017). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. https://www.coso.org/guidance-erm

Cosma, S., & Rimo, G. (2024). Redefining insurance through technology: Achievements and perspectives in Insurtech. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102301

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Ebrahimi, N., & Aref, M. (2024). The role of smart supervision in enhancing transparency and trust in Iran's insurance industry [Conference paper]. 31st National and 12th International Conference on Insurance and Development, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/2148797/ (in Persian)

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2017). A common supervisory culture. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2021). SupTech strategy. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2022a). General principles of supervision. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2022b). Supervision in a fast-paced digital world. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/

Financial Services Regulatory Authority. (2014). Risk-based supervisory framework. https://fsrastlucia.org/images/Risk-Based_Supervisory_Framework.pdf

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581

Georgosouli, A., & Okonjo, J. (2022). The algorithmic future of insurance supervision in the EU: A reality check. In P. Marano & K. Noussia (Eds.), The Governance of Insurance Undertakings: Corporate Law and Insurance Regulation (pp. 217-244). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85817-9_10

Gunningham, N., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258261698_Smart_Regulation_Designing_Environment_Policy

Holland, C. P., & Kavuri, A. S. (2025). Insurtech strategies: A comparison of incumbent insurance firms with new entrants. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 50(1), 78–105. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-024-00341-0

International Association of Insurance Supervisors. (1999). Principles applicable to the supervision of international insurers and insurance groups and their cross-border business operations. https://www.iais.org/uploads/2022/01/Principles_applicable_to_the_supervision_of_International_insurers_and_insurance_group_and_their_cross_borders_business_operations.pdf

International Association of Insurance Supervisors. (2018). Insurance core principles, standards, guidance and assessment methodology. https://www.iais.org/uploads/2025/06/IAIS-ICPs-and-ComFrame-December-2024.pdf

International Association of Insurance Supervisors. (2025). Roadmap 2025–2026: Key deliverables and supervisory priorities [Press release]. https://www.iais.org/uploads/2025/01/IAIS-Roadmap-2025-2026.pdf

Kamath, M., Dwarkanath, P., & Ganesan, A. (2025). How to become an AI-first insurer: A transformation roadmap [White paper]. Infosys. https://www.infosys.com/industries/insurance/documents/transformation-roadmap.pdf

Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2018). Risk-based supervisory framework. https://fsrastlucia.org/images/Risk-Based_Supervisory_Framework.pdf

Mosadegh, H., & Nazari, M. )2024(. Designing a smart supervision model in the insurance industry [Conference paper]. 31st National and 12th International Conference on Insurance and Development: Public Satisfaction and Trust in the Insurance Industry, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/2148727/ (in Persian)

National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (2024). The state of insurtech. NAIC. https://media-publications.bcg.com/State-of-Insurtech-2024.pdf?linkId=833816433

Niakan, L., Farazmand, S., & Atatalab, F. (2024). A study and pathology of the Law on the Establishment of Central Insurance of Iran and insurance activity. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 15(60), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2023.399753.1864 (in Persian)

Norani, V. (2021). An overview of the concept of supervisory technology (SAPTECH) and some mechanisms for its use in supervision of the insurance industry. Insurance Research Institute. https://www.irc.ac.ir/fa-IR/Irc/4946/Articles/view/14643/1535 (in Persian)

Prenio, J., Pustelnikov, A., & Yeo, J. (2024). Building a more diverse suptech ecosystem: Findings from surveys of financial authorities and suptech vendors [White paper]. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsibriefs23.htm

Prenio, J., & Yong, J. (2021). Humans keeping AI in check – Emerging regulatory expectations in the financial sector (FSI Insights No. 35). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights35.htm

Raeesi, M., & Fallahnejad, M. R. (2024). Presenting a paradigmatic model of smart supervision to enhance public trust in the insurance industry [Conference paper]. 31st National and 12th International Conference on Insurance and Development, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/2148847/ (in Persian)

Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555015

World Bank Group. (2020). A roadmap to SupTech solutions for low income (IDA) countries. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/108411602047902677/pdf/A-Roadmap-to-SupTech-Solutions-for-Low-Income-IDA-Countries.pdf

Zarsky, T. (2015). The trouble with algorithmic decisions: An analytic roadmap to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 118–132. https://philpapers.org/rec/ZARTTW